We test the human layer.
Authorized phishing, vishing, and targeted social engineering exercises that measure real human risk under clear rules.
Controlled pressure on the human layer
Technology controls fail when people are convinced to click, share, or approve. Advanced social engineering assessments measure how your organization responds to realistic pretexting—not cartoon phishing templates.
Campaigns may include spear phishing, attachment or link payloads in a safe lab style, callback/vishing scenarios, and multi-step lures aligned to your industry. Everything runs under explicit rules of engagement: approved domains, brands, targets, and success criteria.
Results focus on process and control gaps: reporting culture, mailbox filtering, identity verification, helpdesk procedures, and privileged-user exposure. We avoid blame narratives and emphasize measurable hardening.
Useful before awareness program redesigns, after mergers, or when executives and finance teams are high-value targets for BEC-style fraud.
Frequently asked questions
Is employee shaming part of the report?
No. We report aggregate and role-level patterns as agreed—never public individual blame.
Can you mimic our brand in phishing tests?
Only with written authorization and approved lookalike assets under the rules of engagement.
Do you include vishing?
Yes, when scoped. Voice-based pretexting often reveals helpdesk and verification gaps.
How do you handle accidental malware fears?
Payloads are controlled and non-destructive by default; we explain safety measures to stakeholders before launch.
Talk about scope
Tell us the objective and we will scope the engagement with clear rules.